The Green Electricity Tariff: What Does a Company Get for the Premium?

Published by Quinn Lai | By InverPower Technical Team

Published 22 August 2026 · Last updated 22 August 2026

The Green Electricity Tariff is the lowest-effort way for a Malaysian company to put renewable electricity on its reporting. That is its strength and its limitation, and an EPCC who understands both can have a more useful conversation with a client than one who treats it as competition.

The subscription buys attributes

The consumer subscribes through the myTNB portal to a volume of electricity attributed to renewable generation, and pays a premium on top of the normal tariff for that volume. The physical supply is unchanged — the same grid, the same meter, the same wires. What changes is the attribute: the consumer can account for that volume as renewable, and TNB retires the corresponding attributes on their behalf.

Two administrative points matter in practice. Subscription is allocated against a national quota, reported at up to 6,600 GWh, on a first-come-first-served basis with current availability published by TNB. And applications are reviewed rather than automatic, though the process is short. A client who decides in principle and applies six months later may find a different quota position.

It is also a subscription rather than a one-off purchase, which means it can be adjusted. A company that subscribes for its full consumption this year and builds an array next year is not stuck with both — the subscription is sized to the volume it wants attributed, and that volume can come down as on-site generation comes up. Worth saying to a client who is hesitating because they think they are choosing permanently.

The bill-side argument that has grown

GET began as an environmental purchase and has acquired a financial argument. Subscribers are reported to be shielded from the fuel-cost adjustment that moves the rest of the bill — the component that passes generation fuel costs through to consumers and that has been the source of most of the volatility Malaysian businesses have seen since the tariff restructuring.

That reframes the premium as a hedge rather than a donation, and it is why finance directors who ignored the scheme are now asking about it. It is also a claim worth confirming against TNB's current terms before repeating it to a client, because the treatment of a bill component is exactly the kind of thing that gets revised.

Three routes to the same commitment

Competing with a rooftop proposal

It competes when the client's only goal is a reportable renewable share and they want it this quarter. Nothing an EPCC can build matches a subscription for speed, and pretending otherwise wastes credibility.

It does not compete on the bill. A subscription adds a premium to every unit; an array removes units from the bill entirely and cuts the peak that sets the demand charge under the current tariff structure. Those are opposite effects on cost, and the demand-charge reduction in particular is something no purchased attribute can deliver.

So the honest framing for a client is sequencing rather than rivalry. Subscribe now for the immediate reporting position, build on the roof for the operating cost, and reduce the subscription as generation comes online. Clients respect that answer, and it keeps the EPCC in the conversation instead of being the person who argued against the easy option.

There is a second reason not to argue against it. A client who has subscribed has already accepted that renewable electricity costs money and has a budget line for it. That is a far easier conversation to build a rooftop proposal on than one that starts from scratch, because the principle is settled and only the mechanism is open.

Check these before advising

Whether the client's reporting framework accepts purchased attributes for the claim they want to make, which is a question for their sustainability adviser rather than for either of you. Whether quota is currently available, since it is finite and moves. How the subscription interacts with any on-site generation they already have. And what the current terms say about the bill components, rather than what an article said last year.

InverPower supplies the equipment behind the on-site half of that plan — Sungrow inverters, Trinasolar modules, mounting, protection and cable, held in Malaysia. Send the bill of materials and we will tell you what is in stock while the client sorts out the subscription.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does GET count towards the same reporting as on-site solar?

It depends on the framework the client reports under, and it is their sustainability adviser's call rather than an EPCC's. Broadly, purchased attributes and self-generated electricity are recorded differently, and some frameworks distinguish clearly between them. Ask the question before the client assumes the answer.

Is GET cheaper than installing rooftop solar?

It costs nothing up front and adds a premium to every unit. Rooftop solar costs capital and then removes units from the bill. Over the life of an array the on-site route is normally the cheaper source of electricity; GET is the faster and lower-commitment route to a reporting position.

Can a company subscribe to GET and install solar?

Yes, and it is a sensible sequence: subscribe for the immediate position, build for the operating cost, and adjust the subscription as generation comes online. The two are not exclusive.

Is GET quota always available?

No. Subscription is allocated first-come-first-served against a national quota, with current availability published by TNB. A client who decides in principle and applies much later may find the position has changed.

Sources

• TNB — Green Electricity Tariff programme page and current quota availability — https://www.tnb.com.my/GET
• myTNB — Green Electricity Tariff for business, subscription process — https://www.mytnb.com.my/business/special-schemes/greenelectricitytariff
• TNB — Green Electricity Tariff contract terms and conditions — https://www.tnb.com.my/assets/files/Term_and_Condition_GET_2025.pdf
• Suruhanjaya Tenaga — Corporate Renewable Energy Supply Scheme, the contracted-supply alternative — https://www.st.gov.my
• SEDA Malaysia — Solar ATAP programme for on-site generation — https://www.seda.gov.my/reportal/atap/

Related InverPower posts:

• CGPP and CRESS: How Does a Company Buy Renewable Energy It Cannot Generate?
• Time-of-Use Tariffs and Solar: Why Does the Timing Matter More Than the Total?
• PPA, Lease or Outright Purchase: Which Should You Put in Front of a Client?